Whelth Research · Med Spas · September 2026

The State of America's Med Spas — 2026

What 14,748 U.S. med spas actually sell — and how far the category has moved from Botox into prescription medicine.

40%
list a prescription weight-loss program
57%
sell at least one medical intervention — most commonly weight loss, IV therapy or hormones (full list under Definitions)
93%
of those sellers list no blood-testing service on their menu
2×
as likely to sell weight loss as a plastic-surgery or dermatology practice

Key findings

  1. Of 14,748 U.S. med spas whose published service menus Whelth Research reviewed, 57.3% (8,444) list at least one medical intervention — most commonly a prescription weight-loss program, IV/NAD+ infusions, hormone therapy or peptides; the full twelve-service definition is under Definitions — alongside, or instead of, aesthetic treatments. #
  2. 40.1% of reviewed med spas (5,913) list a medical weight-loss program, a category that in this market is predominantly GLP-1 prescribing (semaglutide, tirzepatide). More med spas list weight loss than list lip fillers (30.2%), Sculptra (35.1%) or CoolSculpting (9.6%). #
  3. Weight loss is the med spa's sixth most common service overall, behind Botox (72.9%), microneedling (71.9%), chemical peels (63.7%), dermal fillers (61.6%) and laser hair removal (52.8%) — and ahead of every other aesthetic treatment on the menu. #
  4. 38.3% list IV or NAD+ therapy, 21% list hormone therapy (HRT, TRT or thyroid optimization) and 11.4% list peptide therapy — the compounded category the FDA moved to restrict in 2023–24. #
  5. Testing rarely comes with the prescription: only 8.6% of reviewed med spas list any diagnostic service and 4.2% list blood testing. Of the 8,444 med spas selling a medical intervention, 93.1% list no blood-testing service on their published menu and 86% list no diagnostic service of any kind. #
  6. Of the 5,913 med spas listing a weight-loss program, 92.2% list no blood-testing service; of the 3,100 listing hormone therapy, 86.6%. #
  7. The drift is a med-spa phenomenon more than an aesthetics one: among 4,699 aesthetic medical practices (plastic surgery and dermatology), 20.6% list weight loss and 9.4% hormone therapy, versus 40.1% and 21% of med spas. A med spa is roughly twice as likely as a plastic surgeon to sell weight-loss drugs. #
  8. Among states with 100+ reviewed med spas, Utah (48.6%), Florida (48.5%), Arkansas (48.4%) and Arizona (48.1%) have the highest share of med spas selling weight loss; Mississippi (25%), Alabama (29.5%) and New York (31.1%) the lowest. Among metros with 100+ reviewed med spas, Salt Lake City (53.9%), Phoenix (53.2%), Miami (51.3%) and Charlotte (50.5%) lead; Minneapolis (29.6%), San Francisco (30.7%) and New York (30.9%) trail. #

Every figure is a share of the med spas reviewed, describing services each practice listed on its own website when it was read — not clinical conduct, and not an estimate of every med spa in the country. Data collected July 18 – September 7, 2026 (98% of practices on July 24–25). Analysis computed September 11, 2026. See Definitions and Methodology. Data: JSON, CSV under each table.

Summary

The med spa was built on a short menu: neuromodulators, fillers, lasers, peels. Whelth Research reviewed the published service menus of 14,748 U.S. med spas across 51 states and 3,002 cities — each service recorded with a verbatim excerpt from the practice's own website — and found the menu has changed. 57.3% now list at least one medical intervention. The largest single addition is prescription weight loss, listed by 40.1% of med spas reviewed; IV and NAD+ infusions follow at 38.3%, hormone therapy at 21%, peptides at 11.4%.

What has not followed is measurement. Only 8.6% of reviewed med spas list any diagnostic service and 4.2% list blood testing, so 93.1% of the med spas selling a medical intervention show no blood-testing service on the menu that sells it. The move is national — in every state with 100 or more reviewed med spas, at least one in four lists weight loss — and what varies is how far it has gone: from 25% of reviewed med spas in Mississippi to 48.6% in Utah.

Definitions

A service counts only when the practice's own website evidences it (captured verbatim at review time). Categories used in this report:

Reviewed med spaa practice classified as a med spa in Whelth's directory with at least one service evidenced on its own website (n = 14,748)
Medical interventionmedical weight loss (GLP-1 programs), hormone replacement therapy (HRT), testosterone therapy (TRT), thyroid optimization, peptide therapy, IV therapy, NAD+ therapy, sexual-health treatments, hyperbaric oxygen, ozone therapy, stem-cell therapy, ketamine therapy
Hormone therapyHRT, TRT, thyroid optimization
Diagnostic (any)blood testing / lab panels, biomarker panels, genetic testing, DEXA, body composition analysis, VO₂ max testing, continuous glucose monitoring, coronary calcium scoring, multi-cancer early detection, full-body MRI, clinical sleep studies
Blood testingblood testing / lab panels, biomarker panels
Sharea percentage of the med spas reviewed (or of the sellers named in the row) — never an estimate of all U.S. med spas

Medical weight loss is classed as an intervention because, in this market, it is predominantly GLP-1 prescribing; the category's matched terms include semaglutide, tirzepatide, GLP-1, Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and Zepbound. Surgical procedures that appear on med-spa websites are not published: on a med-spa site the evidence is too often a visiting surgeon's biography or "non-surgical facelift" copy.

The aesthetic core

The traditional menu is intact. Neuromodulators and microneedling are each listed by more than seven in ten med spas reviewed; peels, fillers and laser hair removal by more than half.

Table 1. Share of reviewed U.S. med spas listing each aesthetic service on their own website (n = 14,748, computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
ServiceMed spas listing itShare of reviewed
Botox & neuromodulators10,75472.9%
Microneedling10,60771.9%
Chemical peels9,39563.7%
Dermal fillers9,09061.6%
Laser hair removal7,78952.8%
Sculptra5,18035.1%
Lip fillers4,45230.2%
Laser skin resurfacing3,17921.6%
Kybella3,16421.5%
Thread lift2,27715.4%
PRF treatment1,47910.0%
CoolSculpting1,4189.6%
A practice is counted once per service regardless of how many pages mention it. Sculptra and Kybella are branded products (poly-L-lactic acid and deoxycholic acid injections).

The medical layer

Beneath the aesthetic menu, most med spas reviewed now sell medicine. Weight loss is the largest addition and is listed by more med spas than any aesthetic service outside the top five.

The medical layer on U.S. med spa menusThe medical layer on U.S. med spa menusShare of 14,748 reviewed U.S. med spas listing each medical service on their own website(2026)Medical weight loss (GLP-1 programs)40.1%IV therapy35.5%PRP therapy26.2%Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)18.9%NAD+ therapy13%Sexual-health treatments11.4%Peptide therapy11.4%Testosterone therapy (TRT)6%Functional medicine5.6%Source: Whelth Research, "The State of America's Med Spas — 2026" · whelth.com/research/state-of-med-spas-2026
Percentages are of all med spas reviewed. Download this chart: SVG. Free to republish with attribution (CC BY 4.0).
Table 2. Share of reviewed U.S. med spas listing each medical service on their own website (n = 14,748, computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
ServiceMed spas listing itShare of reviewed
Medical weight loss (GLP-1 programs)5,91340.1%
IV therapy5,24035.5%
PRP therapy3,86126.2%
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)2,79018.9%
NAD+ therapy1,91713.0%
Sexual-health treatments1,68811.4%
Peptide therapy1,68611.4%
Testosterone therapy (TRT)8886.0%
Functional medicine8255.6%
Body composition analysis6544.4%
Blood testing / lab panels6034.1%
Hyperbaric oxygen2451.7%
PRP therapy is listed here rather than with aesthetics because it is sold for hair restoration, joint and sexual-health indications as well as facial treatment.

57.3% of med spas reviewed list at least one medical intervention (8,444 practices). Nearly all of them still sell the original product: 84.6% of the med spas listing a medical intervention also list Botox. The medical layer is an addition to the aesthetic menu, not a replacement for it.

Table 3. Medical interventions on med spa menus versus aesthetic medical practices (plastic surgery and dermatology practices in Whelth's aesthetics directory; computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
Practice typenWeight lossHormone therapyIV / NAD+Any medical intervention
Med spa14,74840.1%21.0%38.3%57.3%
Plastic surgery / dermatology practice4,69920.6%9.4%9.9%29.7%
Aesthetic medical practices are physician practices classified in Whelth's aesthetics directory (practice type private practice), with at least one evidenced service.

The comparison shows where the drift lives. A plastic-surgery or dermatology practice is far less likely to have added weight-loss drugs (20.6%) or hormones (9.4%) to its menu than a med spa (40.1% and 21%). The med spa — a retail-format business typically run by nurse injectors under a medical director — has become the main storefront for prescription weight loss in aesthetic medicine.

Sold without testing

GLP-1 prescribing, hormone therapy and peptide protocols are built on laboratory values. On med spa menus, the laboratory is mostly absent.

Table 4. Diagnostic services on the menus of med spas selling medical interventions (n = 14,748 reviewed med spas, computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
GroupMed spasList no blood testingList no diagnostic at all
All reviewed med spas14,74895.8%91.4%
Selling any medical intervention8,44493.1%86.0%
Selling medical weight loss5,91392.2%
Selling hormone therapy3,10086.6%
Selling peptide therapy1,68687.1%
Percentages are of the group in that row. Blood testing = blood testing / lab panels or biomarker panels listed as a service. “—” = not computed for that row. A practice that draws labs without listing testing on its site counts as listing none — see Limitations.

Of the 5,913 med spas reviewed that sell a weight-loss program, 92.2% list no blood-testing service on their published menu; of the 3,100 selling hormone therapy, 86.6%. These are higher than the figures in Whelth Research's Sold, Not Measured brief (55.4% of med spas selling longevity interventions listed no blood testing) because that brief counted only med spas that qualified as longevity practices — which by definition evidence a diagnostic or a broader longevity menu. This report covers every med spa reviewed, and the wider the lens, the thinner the testing.

By state

States with at least 100 reviewed med spas, ranked by the share listing a weight-loss program. Counts are the number of med spas reviewed in each state, not the number that exist (see Methodology); the shares are the finding.

Table 5. Share of reviewed med spas listing medical services, by state — states with at least 100 reviewed med spas, ranked by weight-loss share (computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
StateReviewed med spasWeight lossHormone therapyAny medical intervention
Utah24548.6%35.9%62.4%
Florida1,27848.5%26.7%65.9%
Arkansas12848.4%32.0%70.3%
Arizona36648.1%31.1%65.6%
Kansas10947.7%33.0%57.8%
Louisiana17047.1%28.8%62.4%
Oklahoma14146.8%34.0%66.0%
Maryland27846.4%20.1%59.0%
Missouri19246.4%29.2%64.6%
Texas1,12445.8%23.5%60.1%
Kentucky17045.3%34.1%68.2%
New Mexico10445.2%32.7%65.4%
Nevada12045.0%21.7%65.0%
North Carolina37743.5%24.9%59.9%
Ohio39443.4%23.4%56.9%
Georgia40343.2%23.1%57.6%
Illinois50742.2%19.7%57.2%
Colorado35041.1%24.3%57.4%
Tennessee29640.5%29.1%60.8%
Idaho13339.1%19.5%60.9%
Virginia37438.8%23.0%49.2%
Oregon21538.1%14.0%52.1%
Wisconsin22437.9%16.1%49.1%
Connecticut19637.2%17.3%54.6%
New Jersey41036.6%15.4%53.2%
Indiana23536.6%22.6%53.2%
Washington40735.9%16.2%50.6%
California2,01335.8%14.1%56.4%
Massachusetts49834.9%13.5%51.4%
Iowa13334.6%19.5%52.6%
South Carolina17234.3%23.3%54.7%
Minnesota25233.3%14.7%46.8%
Pennsylvania24033.3%17.1%54.2%
Michigan34432.3%11.3%52.9%
New York75331.1%12.9%49.4%
Alabama13229.5%23.5%41.7%
Mississippi10025.0%25.0%49.0%
Each practice is counted once, at its primary location. States below 100 reviewed med spas are omitted because a handful of practices would move the share by several points.

Utah (48.6%), Florida (48.5%), Arkansas (48.4%) and Arizona (48.1%) have the highest share of med spas selling weight loss; Mississippi (25%), Alabama (29.5%) and New York (31.1%) the lowest. Hormone therapy follows a similar map — Utah (35.9%), Kentucky (34.1%) and Oklahoma (34%) at the top; Michigan (11.3%), New York (12.9%) and Massachusetts (13.5%) at the bottom. The two most populous states sit on opposite sides: 48.5% of Florida's reviewed med spas sell weight loss against 35.8% of California's.

By metro

Reviewed med spas within 25 miles of each metro center, for the 34 metros where Whelth publishes a med spa directory. Each metro name links to its directory page.

Where med spas sell weight lossWhere med spas sell weight lossShare of reviewed med spas within 25 miles of each metro center listing a medicalweight-loss program (metros with 100+ reviewed med spas, 2026)Salt Lake City, UT53.9%Phoenix, AZ53.2%Miami, FL51.3%Charlotte, NC50.5%Tampa, FL50.3%Baltimore, MD49.1%Atlanta, GA45.1%Orlando, FL43.9%Houston, TX43.5%Chicago, IL43.4%Dallas, TX43%San Diego, CA42.3%Philadelphia, PA41.3%Orange County, CA40.3%Denver, CO40%Portland, OR38.2%Boston, MA37.4%Washington, DC37.3%San Jose, CA35.5%Detroit, MI35.1%Seattle, WA35%Los Angeles, CA31.5%New York, NY30.9%San Francisco, CA30.7%Minneapolis, MN29.6%Source: Whelth Research, "The State of America's Med Spas — 2026" · whelth.com/research/state-of-med-spas-2026
Metros with fewer than 100 reviewed med spas appear in the table below but not in the chart. Download this chart: SVG. Free to republish with attribution (CC BY 4.0).
Table 6. Reviewed med spas within 25 miles of each metro center, and the share listing medical services — ranked by weight-loss share (computed 2026-09-11) · CSV · #
MetroReviewed med spas (25 mi)Weight lossAny medical intervention
Kansas City, MO6956.5%68.1%
Salt Lake City, UT14153.9%69.5%
Phoenix, AZ20153.2%70.1%
Raleigh, NC7753.2%63.6%
Miami, FL26751.3%70.4%
Charlotte, NC10750.5%68.2%
Tampa, FL19350.3%68.9%
Austin, TX5949.2%54.2%
Baltimore, MD16349.1%61.3%
Las Vegas, NV7247.2%69.4%
Columbus, OH8246.3%59.8%
St. Louis, MO9445.7%66.0%
Atlanta, GA17545.1%59.4%
Orlando, FL15543.9%62.6%
Houston, TX17043.5%64.7%
Chicago, IL24943.4%57.0%
Dallas, TX26343.0%57.0%
San Diego, CA10442.3%60.6%
Philadelphia, PA10441.3%59.6%
Orange County, CA38040.3%63.9%
Denver, CO20540.0%59.0%
Sacramento, CA9739.2%53.6%
Portland, OR13138.2%52.7%
Boston, MA32637.4%53.7%
Washington, DC26337.3%48.3%
Nashville, TN6936.2%59.4%
San Jose, CA14135.5%49.6%
Detroit, MI20235.1%55.0%
Seattle, WA17735.0%52.0%
Los Angeles, CA48031.5%57.5%
New York, NY63430.9%49.1%
San Francisco, CA17930.7%52.0%
Minneapolis, MN18929.6%43.9%
Pittsburgh, PA4422.7%47.7%
Radius: 25 miles (40 km) from the metro's downtown coordinates, so neighbouring metros can overlap. Counts are reviewed med spas, not all med spas in the metro. San Antonio is omitted (fewer than 40 reviewed).

Weight loss on the med spa menu is a Sun Belt and Mountain West phenomenon. Salt Lake City (53.9%), Phoenix (53.2%), Miami (51.3%), Charlotte (50.5%) and Tampa (50.3%) lead the metros with 100 or more reviewed med spas; the coastal capitals of aesthetic medicine trail — New York (30.9%), Los Angeles (31.5%), San Francisco (30.7%) — with Minneapolis (29.6%) lowest of all.

The practices behind the numbers: the 13 Miami-area med spas that publish blood testing with their weight-loss programs — each verified by hand on its own website.

Methodology

Population and dates. The 14,748 practices are every med spa in Whelth's directory as of 11 September 2026 that is classified as a med spa, is live, and has at least one service evidenced on its own website (15,061 med-spa records were live; the difference is unenriched discovery shells). Med spas were discovered through Google Places searches for "med spa" in each of the 2,003 U.S. cities of 25,000 or more people plus earlier metro-by-metro acquisition, then each practice's website was crawled (home page plus up to seven linked service and team pages) and services were matched against Whelth's aesthetic and longevity service vocabularies. Every one of the 108,544 service records carries the source URL, and 108,227 carry a verbatim excerpt from the page; the reviewed med spas list 7.4 services on average. The websites were read between 18 July and 7 September 2026 — 98% of them on 24–25 July, with 232 practices re-read in August and September — and every statistic was computed from that stored evidence on 11 September 2026. A menu can change between the day it was read and the day you read this; the collection window, not the computation date, is the date of the observations.

Why this report publishes shares, not counts. The discovery sweep returned at most 20 results per city (18,893 places across 2,003 cities), so dense metros are under-counted relative to small cities: the numbers of reviewed med spas in New York or Los Angeles are floors, not counts. For that reason this report publishes no per-capita density, no ranking of cities by number of med spas, and no estimate of how many med spas the United States has. Shares — the percentage of reviewed med spas listing a service — do not depend on having found every med spa, though they do reflect the practices Google Places ranks most prominently for "med spa" in each city, which likely favours larger and better-reviewed businesses.

Classification. Each practice's evidenced services were mapped to the aesthetic, medical-intervention, hormone, diagnostic and blood-testing sets defined above. State rows count a practice once, at its primary location, and include states with at least 100 reviewed med spas. Metro rows count reviewed med spas whose primary location lies within 25 miles of the metro's downtown coordinates. The aesthetic medical practices in Table 3 are physician practices in Whelth's aesthetics directory with at least one evidenced service.

Limitations. The analysis sees what a practice publishes. Blood testing is recognised from the terms "blood testing", "blood work", "blood panel", "blood test" and "biomarker panel"; a practice that requires labs but describes them only as "lab work" on a page the crawl did not reach, or orders them through an outside laboratory without listing testing at all, counts as listing none. The testing figures therefore describe published menus, not clinical conduct, and are reported only as shares of a category. Nothing here characterises any individual practice. All figures describe the collection window above and will be refreshed at this URL.

Cite this report

Whelth Research. (2026). The State of America's Med Spas — 2026. WHELTH. https://whelth.com/research/state-of-med-spas-2026

Published September 2026. Canonical URL: https://whelth.com/research/state-of-med-spas-2026. Every statistic on this page carries an anchor (the # beside it) for section-level citation.

Data collected July 18 – September 7, 2026 (98% of practices on July 24–25). Analysis computed September 11, 2026.

Data: all tables as JSON · CSV links sit under each table. Generated from the same constants that render this page.

Free to cite and republish with attribution to Whelth Research and a link to this page (CC BY 4.0). The licence covers the published findings, tables, charts and report data on this page only — not WHELTH's underlying practice and provider database or any unpublished data. State or metro cuts for journalists: Sanaz, Research & Partnerships, WHELTH — sanaz@whelth.com.

About Whelth

Whelth is a research platform and national directory for aesthetic, longevity and dental care, with structured profiles built from public records and each practice's own published materials. Whelth Research publishes original data reports from that directory. More at whelth.com/research.